-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 747
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add validate_xcm_nesting
to the ParentAsUmp
and ChildParachainRouter
#4236
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
bkontur
added
R0-silent
Changes should not be mentioned in any release notes
T6-XCM
This PR/Issue is related to XCM.
labels
Apr 22, 2024
4 tasks
ggwpez
reviewed
Apr 22, 2024
franciscoaguirre
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2024
this is not accurate anymore, it is also done inside |
acatangiu
approved these changes
Apr 22, 2024
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This is good!
github-merge-queue bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 23, 2024
…Xcm` router (for testing purposes) (#4186) This PR: - adds `EnsureDecodableXcm` (testing) router that attempts to *encode* and *decode* passed XCM `message` to ensure that the receiving side will be able to decode, at least with the same XCM version. - fixes `pallet_xcm` / `pallet_xcm_benchmarks` assets data generation Relates to investigation of https://substrate.stackexchange.com/questions/11288 and missing fix #2129 which did not get into the fellows 1.1.X release. ## Questions/TODOs - [x] fix XCM benchmarks, which produces undecodable data - new router catched at least two cases - `BoundedVec exceeds its limit` - `Fungible asset of zero amount is not allowed` - [x] do we need to add `sort` to the `prepend_with` as we did for reanchor [here](#2129)? @serban300 (**created separate/follow-up PR**: #4235) - [x] We added decoding check to `XcmpQueue` -> `validate_xcm_nesting`, why not to added to the `ParentAsUmp` or `ChildParachainRouter`? @franciscoaguirre (**created separate/follow-up PR**: #4236) - [ ] `SendController::send_blob` replace `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode(` with `VersionedXcm::<()>::decode_with_depth_limit(MAX_XCM_DECODE_DEPTH, data)` ? --------- Co-authored-by: Adrian Catangiu <adrian@parity.io>
This was referenced Jun 5, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR:
validate_xcm_nesting
fromXcmpQueue
into theVersionedXcm
validate_xcm_nesting
to theParentAsUmp
validate_xcm_nesting
to theChildParachainRouter
Based on discussion here and/or here and/or here
Question/TODO
validate_xcm_nesting
added just to theXcmpQueue
router and nowhere else? What kind of problemMAX_XCM_DECODE_DEPTH
is solving? (see comment)